<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dolores Park Revovations Delayed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/</link>
	<description>news, gossip and scenes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:06:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dolores Park Group Works Cited &#171; English 1A • CCSF</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-164</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dolores Park Group Works Cited &#171; English 1A • CCSF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 6 Mar. 2010 http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations- delayed/? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6 Mar. 2010 <a href="http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-" rel="nofollow">http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-</a> delayed/? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newshound</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newshound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All good questions Don. For more indepth info on the Playground rebuild, scheduled to start this fall, go to the&lt;a href=&quot;http://friendsofdolorespark.org&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; Friends of Dolores Park Playground&lt;/a&gt;. I know the plans call for the use of lots of natural materials and a natural seperation of the playground and the rest of the park.
And yes, the Supper Slide is right in the middle of Gay Beach.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All good questions Don. For more indepth info on the Playground rebuild, scheduled to start this fall, go to the<a href="http://friendsofdolorespark.org" rel="nofollow"> Friends of Dolores Park Playground</a>. I know the plans call for the use of lots of natural materials and a natural seperation of the playground and the rest of the park.<br />
And yes, the Supper Slide is right in the middle of Gay Beach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Ross</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 23:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello-- thanks for this forum.

I do like the idea of thinking long-term, 30-40 years into the future, and seeing if all these improvements, if you will, will have been so necessary? I hope I&#039;m surprised. Above all, I hope it doesn&#039;t look too &#039;Disney&#039;.......too brightly lit at night (ironically), too cultivated. One of the things I like about our neighborhood, and park, is that it has an &#039;edge&#039;--- which is dissapperaing in SF for certain.

I&#039;m also I like that the was mention of a focus on open spaces. With regard to the new playground, I&#039;m suspicious there will be a fence around the perimeter, I understand people want to keep dogs out, but I believe it is the owners&#039; responsibility to do so, not the City&#039;s. Any barrier creates a barrier, either physically or psychologically. I think if you see a fence, you&#039;re going to think &quot;private space&quot;, not &quot;public space&quot;.

Speaking of the Playground, which I know is a seperate issue, I&#039;m glad to see that kids of all ages (i.e. &#039;adults&#039; too) will be included, and encouraged to play along. I&#039;d hate not to have a similar &#039;Old Big Swing&#039; like there exists now, the kind I used to swing on as a kid--- and I hope the new one is similar, so when it&#039;s appropriate, Big Kids like myself can swing, too!

Re: the colors of the kids&#039; areas-- I also hope it is toned-down and fits in with the landscape, that the chosen colors are not too distracting or bright. And why a Flag, if the whole play area is visual enough. Again, another signal of ownership, even if it has a smiley face on it--- in the middle of the park it will be a distracting eyesore.  

And will The Super Slide, as cool as it sounds, will it obstruct the skyline view at all? (I&#039;m guess not, altho I think those at &quot;Dolores Beach&quot; on the south side hill area will see something entirely new in their midst--- I&#039;m not a social scientist, but will that change the existing culture as it is now?  Will gay boys sunning themselves on the hill be asked to cover up their bikinis...now that children are around?  I&#039;m just sayin&#039;........

I&#039;m leary of too many changes, although I want to stay hopeful. Thanks for listening.  -D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello&#8211; thanks for this forum.</p>
<p>I do like the idea of thinking long-term, 30-40 years into the future, and seeing if all these improvements, if you will, will have been so necessary? I hope I&#8217;m surprised. Above all, I hope it doesn&#8217;t look too &#8216;Disney&#8217;&#8230;&#8230;.too brightly lit at night (ironically), too cultivated. One of the things I like about our neighborhood, and park, is that it has an &#8216;edge&#8217;&#8212; which is dissapperaing in SF for certain.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also I like that the was mention of a focus on open spaces. With regard to the new playground, I&#8217;m suspicious there will be a fence around the perimeter, I understand people want to keep dogs out, but I believe it is the owners&#8217; responsibility to do so, not the City&#8217;s. Any barrier creates a barrier, either physically or psychologically. I think if you see a fence, you&#8217;re going to think &#8220;private space&#8221;, not &#8220;public space&#8221;.</p>
<p>Speaking of the Playground, which I know is a seperate issue, I&#8217;m glad to see that kids of all ages (i.e. &#8216;adults&#8217; too) will be included, and encouraged to play along. I&#8217;d hate not to have a similar &#8216;Old Big Swing&#8217; like there exists now, the kind I used to swing on as a kid&#8212; and I hope the new one is similar, so when it&#8217;s appropriate, Big Kids like myself can swing, too!</p>
<p>Re: the colors of the kids&#8217; areas&#8211; I also hope it is toned-down and fits in with the landscape, that the chosen colors are not too distracting or bright. And why a Flag, if the whole play area is visual enough. Again, another signal of ownership, even if it has a smiley face on it&#8212; in the middle of the park it will be a distracting eyesore.  </p>
<p>And will The Super Slide, as cool as it sounds, will it obstruct the skyline view at all? (I&#8217;m guess not, altho I think those at &#8220;Dolores Beach&#8221; on the south side hill area will see something entirely new in their midst&#8212; I&#8217;m not a social scientist, but will that change the existing culture as it is now?  Will gay boys sunning themselves on the hill be asked to cover up their bikinis&#8230;now that children are around?  I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>I&#8217;m leary of too many changes, although I want to stay hopeful. Thanks for listening.  -D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newshound</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newshound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, we need to preserve the character of Dolores, the sweeping grassy slopes, the palms. If we go nuts with a wish list of wants and needs, we run the danger of crowding in too much stuff. Or dividing up the space into individual domains.  This is going to be fun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we need to preserve the character of Dolores, the sweeping grassy slopes, the palms. If we go nuts with a wish list of wants and needs, we run the danger of crowding in too much stuff. Or dividing up the space into individual domains.  This is going to be fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janas</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you, I will write her. Mostly I&#039;m concerned about how the lay of the land is to change, and wondering if this will turn out like the old Union Square remod (a great disappointment). And I don&#039;t see why they couldn&#039;t close one half at time. 

Thanks again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, I will write her. Mostly I&#8217;m concerned about how the lay of the land is to change, and wondering if this will turn out like the old Union Square remod (a great disappointment). And I don&#8217;t see why they couldn&#8217;t close one half at time. </p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: newshound</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[newshound]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Janas, the &quot;overall reconditioning line&quot; authorizes the project to finish off the park with grass, bushes,and plants, I believe. The reason the park needs to be fenced off is because it is a big project. All the water pipes and drainage need to be redone.  Your concerns about losing this valuable asset for such a long time a most valid.  Let Park and Rec, Capitol Improvement office know of your concerns. e-mail RPD Project Manager Mary Hobson (mary.hobson@sfgov.org).  Mary has said that the 18 month estimate may be too cautious and that the project could be finished in &quot;significantly less time&quot;.  And the playground is beginning first, September or October of this year. And will be finished and open first.

Start thinking and writing now about what you would like Dolores to look like when it is finished and send your comment to the Park Department.  Open Public meetings will be begin this Summer. We have a voice in this project. Everyone can participate in the design and planning of the renovated
park.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janas, the &#8220;overall reconditioning line&#8221; authorizes the project to finish off the park with grass, bushes,and plants, I believe. The reason the park needs to be fenced off is because it is a big project. All the water pipes and drainage need to be redone.  Your concerns about losing this valuable asset for such a long time a most valid.  Let Park and Rec, Capitol Improvement office know of your concerns. e-mail RPD Project Manager Mary Hobson (mary.hobson@sfgov.org).  Mary has said that the 18 month estimate may be too cautious and that the project could be finished in &#8220;significantly less time&#8221;.  And the playground is beginning first, September or October of this year. And will be finished and open first.</p>
<p>Start thinking and writing now about what you would like Dolores to look like when it is finished and send your comment to the Park Department.  Open Public meetings will be begin this Summer. We have a voice in this project. Everyone can participate in the design and planning of the renovated<br />
park.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janas</title>
		<link>http://missiondolorespark.com/2010/02/03/dolores-park-revovations-delayed/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Janas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://missiondolorespark.com/?p=634#comment-150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it possible to see more specifically what is meant by &quot;overall reconditioning of the park landscape&quot;? And why must the full two square blocks and central strip be closed for two years, why not do it in pieces? Thank you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible to see more specifically what is meant by &#8220;overall reconditioning of the park landscape&#8221;? And why must the full two square blocks and central strip be closed for two years, why not do it in pieces? Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

